Contextual Advertising: How to Reach High-Intent Buyers Without Personal Data
Sarah Moss
February 6, 2026
10
minutes read
Contextual advertising is becoming a practical way to stay relevant as third-party signals fade and privacy expectations rise. Learn how contextual ads work, where they perform best, and how to build content-based targeting that reaches high-intent buyers without relying on personal data.
Contextual advertising is back in the spotlight, and not as a “pre-cookie” throwback. Modern contextual ads use richer signals (topics, semantics, sentiment, and brand suitability) to match a contextual ad to the moment someone is actually reading, watching, or playing. If you’ve been asking what is contextual advertising, the short answer is: it targets content, not people.
That distinction matters in part because the U.S. digital ad market is still expanding at an enormous scale. IAB/PwC estimates 2024 internet ad revenue reached $259B, up 15% year over year. At the same time, the data plumbing that made audience-based targeting so straightforward is under increasing strain, and IAB’s State of Data 2024highlights how privacy legislation and signal loss are reshaping data strategies—while pushing many teams to expect personalization and targeting to get harder unless they adapt how they operate.
All of that sets up the real question: if audience signals are getting noisier and harder to rely on, what does “good targeting” look like when you start from the content itself, not the identifier. Contextual is one of the clearest answers, but only if you understand what it actually is (and what it isn’t), how platforms classify environments, where contextual performance tends to hold up, and where it can fall apart when the inputs are thin or the suitability rules are too blunt.
In the full piece, we break it down end to end, including what contextual advertising means in practice, how contextual matching works, the benefits and trade-offs to expect, the main types of contextual targeting, and how the approach has evolved as AI has made page and video understanding more granular. If you want a practical view—grounded in how buying and measurement work now—keep reading.
Contextual advertising is a targeting method that places ads based on the environment a person is in—what they are reading, watching, or engaging with—rather than who they are or what their historical behavior suggests.
In practice, contextual targeting answers questions like:
“What is this content about?”
“What is the tone or sentiment?”
“Is this a brand-suitable environment for us?”
“Does this context signal intent that matches our offer?”
The classic example still holds: a running shoe ad beside an article about marathon training. But modern contextual advertising can operate at several levels of precision:
Topic level (e.g., “Strength training for beginners”)
Entity level (brands, products, places, people mentioned in the content)
Sentiment level (e.g., “positive review” vs “product recall”)
Program or scene level for streaming video (via metadata, transcripts, or classification)
The common thread: the decision is driven by context signals instead of identity signals.
⚡ Context is how you stay relevant when you don’t have permission—or simply don’t need—to know who the user is.
How contextual advertising works
Contextual advertising is usually a pipeline. The specifics vary by vendor, but the workflow tends to look like this:
Content is analyzed: For web/app inventory that can mean parsing text, headlines, and structure. For video and CTV it often means program metadata, closed captions, or transcripts. For gaming it can mean game genre and in-game “moment” signals (menu vs gameplay vs post-level screens).
A contextual label is assigned: Many systems map content into a taxonomy (often aligned to IAB categories), then layer in additional dimensions:
Custom segments (built around business outcomes like “home renovation planners” or “new parent routines”)
Context becomes a decisioning input: In programmatic buying, contextual signals can be used as deal criteria, pre-bid filters, or bidder inputs. The bidder then decides whether to bid, how much to bid, and which creative to serve.
Measurement closes the loop: A contextual strategy becomes repeatable when you can report outcomes by context tier and validate results with lift or holdouts where feasible.
📍 A practical note: contextual systems are only as good as the rules you give them. If your “allow list” is vague and your exclusions are inconsistent, the model will faithfully deliver vague, inconsistent results.
Here’s a quick checklist to pressure-test your setup before you scale spend:
Can you explain each segment as a buyer moment (not just a broad category)?
Can you see reporting by topic/sentiment/suitability tier (not just aggregate)?
Do you have exclusions that protect you from obvious adjacency risks (but aren’t so broad they kill reach)?
Do you have a creative plan per segment (message matches moment)?
Do you have a lift plan (at least one method to validate incrementality)?
Planned investment in contextual advertising (Source)
Key business benefits of contextual advertising
Contextual advertising tends to win when brands need relevance at scale but cannot (or should not) depend on personal data. The benefits below are written in business terms—things you can measure, govern, and explain to stakeholders.
High-intent reach without personal data
Intent is often visible in the content itself. A user reading “best mattress for back pain” or watching a “how to meal prep” video is signaling a near-term need, even if you know nothing about their past browsing.
That’s also why contextual has become a core response to signal loss. In Proximic by Comscore’s 2025 State of Programmaticreport, 41% of marketers said contextual targeting is their primary strategy for navigating shrinking ID coverage and privacy regulations, and 52% said they plan to increase their use of contextual data in 2025.
How to measure this benefit:
Reach in high-intent contexts (impressions and unique reach within your chosen categories)
Conversion rate and CPA by context tier
Incremental lift versus non-contextual baselines (geo tests, holdouts, or platform lift studies)
📍 A useful rule of thumb: if your contextual segment can’t be described as a buyer moment (“researching,” “comparing,” “solving a problem”), it’s probably too broad.
Privacy compliance by design
Contextual targeting does not require a persistent identifier to function. That doesn’t make it “compliance-proof,” but it usually reduces the surface area for risk:
fewer consent dependencies
fewer data-sharing obligations
fewer scenarios where targeting collapses because identifiers disappear
Consumer expectations are moving in the same direction. Cisco’s 2024 Consumer Privacy Survey found81% of U.S. respondents believe the U.S. should implement a nationwide privacy law. Separately, Deloitte reported that 70% of respondents worry about data privacy and security when using digital services.
Audience-based buying often has two volatility drivers: data availability (match rates, consent rates, policy changes) and data costs (segment fees, identity vendor “tax,” and intermediary markups).
Contextual doesn’t remove volatility, but it usually provides a steadier baseline because the signal is tied to inventory rather than the user graph.
Proximic by Comscore’s findings suggest privacy laws are directly pressuring audience targeting: 61% of respondents expect audience targeting to be most impacted, while 60% are adjusting targeting strategies and 59% are re-evaluating datasets for compliance.
How to measure this benefit:
CPM and CPA variance over time (stability matters as much as averages)
Performance sensitivity to ID loss (compare ID-present vs ID-scarce inventory)
Marginal cost of incremental reach within your context segments
Greater control over brand environments
Contextual is also a governance tool. When you define the contexts you want, you’re defining:
where your brand is comfortable appearing
where you want to avoid adjacency
what kinds of content support your positioning
This becomes more important as brands move into formats with less obvious page-level context (CTV, short-form video, gaming), where classification and suitability controls often determine whether a buy is acceptable.
A practical recommendation: treat brand suitability as a tiering exercise, not a binary “safe/unsafe” switch. Many brands can run in “hard news” but avoid crisis coverage; they can run in health content but avoid severe illness narratives; they can run in finance content but avoid “scam” framing. Contextual gives you the knobs to do that, as long as you define them.
⚡ If your contextual settings are just ‘blocklists,’ you’re leaving brand control—and performance—on the table.
Cost waterfall showing only 41.0 cents of every ad dollar entering a DSP (Source)
Contextual works almost anywhere, but it performs best when the context carries genuine meaning—either because it signals intent, or because it shapes perception.
Mid-to-upper funnel and high-consideration purchases
Contextual targeting is strong for categories where people research before they buy:
Home and furniture (guides, reviews, renovation content)
Health and wellness (fitness, nutrition, routine-building)
B2B software and services (problem/solution content, comparisons)
These journeys are rarely one-click. The job is to appear when the buyer is in a mindset that makes your message credible.
Practical tip: build segments around the decision journey (learn → compare → choose). Then map creative to each stage:
learn: explain the problem, teach basics, remove friction
compare: highlight differentiators and proof points
choose: reduce risk (trial, guarantees, support)
Content-rich categories
Contextual targeting thrives in ecosystems with lots of content to classify:
premium publishers and editorial
long-form video and creator ecosystems
review sites and communities (with careful suitability controls)
These environments give contextual models more signal to work with. They also give advertisers more options for brand-building, because the surroundings can do part of the persuasion for you.
Streaming and publisher environments where user IDs are limited
Connected TV is a good example because targeting often relies on a mix of limited identifiers, household-level signals, and publisher data. Contextual cues become a practical alternative for relevance.
IAB’s 2025 Digital Video Ad Spend & Strategy Report found U.S. digital video ad spend grew to $64B in 2024 and was projected to reach $72B in 2025. Within that, CTV rose from $20.3B in 2023 to $23.6B in 2024, and was projected to hit $26.6B in 2025. When budgets move into streaming, contextual targeting helps answer a simple question: “How do we stay relevant even when user-level identity is partial?”
Contextual advertising isn’t one format; it’s a targeting layer that can be applied across formats. Below are the main types, what they’re good for, and where teams typically go wrong.
Search-based contextual ads
Search is contextual by nature: the user tells you what they want, right now. This includes paid search, shopping ads, and retail media search placements.
A useful structure for search contextual:
group keywords by intent (informational vs transactional)
align landing pages and creative to match
use negative keywords and exclusions to protect budget
📍 Common mistake: treating all queries as equally “ready to buy.” In reality, search intent is a spectrum, and your measurement should reflect that.
Display contextual ads
Display contextual targeting places ads based on webpage or app topics and suitability signals. It’s a practical foundation for cookieless reach because it can work across the open web without requiring user IDs.
📍 Common mistake: using broad categories only (“Sports,” “News”) and assuming the context is tight enough. Broad categories are a starting point, not a strategy.
To tighten display contextual, add at least two more layers:
subtopics (e.g., “running training plans,” not “sports”)
sentiment and suitability tiers
curated domains/publishers for your highest-value segments
Native contextual advertising
Native pairs well with contextual targeting because the unit is designed to fit the surrounding environment. When topic and format align, native can feel more like a useful suggestion than an interruption.
📍 Common mistake: optimizing for “blending in” while neglecting disclosure and message clarity. Contextual native works when the reader understands what they’re seeing and why it’s relevant.
Video & CTV contextual advertising
Video contextual targeting uses metadata (genre, program, channel, sometimes transcript signals) to align ads with what viewers are watching. The practical goal is “moment relevance” at scale—especially when audience signals are incomplete.
📍 Common mistake: assuming genre-level context is enough. For many brands, suitability depends on the specifics of the content, not the label. If you buy “news,” you need a rule set that distinguishes business coverage from crisis coverage.
The different layers of program metadata or how content IDs and schedule data enhance program transparency for programmatic advertising (Source)
In-app and in-game contextual ads
In-app contextual targeting can use app category, in-app screen context, and content signals like article text or video metadata. In gaming, contextual can include game genre, environment, and the moment of play.
IAB’s 2024 research suggests advertisers are increasingly comfortable investing in gaming as a brand-suitable channel.
📍 Common mistake: assuming “mobile app” is a context. It’s not. App category is only the first layer; what happens inside the app matters.
💡 Related reading: Programmatic mobile advertising explained
Contextual vs audience-based targeting
Contextual and audience-based targeting are not enemies. Most sophisticated advertisers use both. The difference is which signal drives the decision.
⚡ Measurement is the next battleground. 80% of marketerssaydeduplicated reach and frequency is critical in programmatic environments—without it, cross-channel optimization becomes guesswork.
A quick decision tree can help teams avoid overcomplicating:
If the job is retention or upsell, start with first-party audiences and apply contextual as a quality filter.
If the job is new customer growth, start with contextual segments and use first-party to exclude converters and existing customers.
If you’re buying in CTV or other ID-limited environments, treat context as the primary signal and optimize around lift and reach, not one-to-one attribution.
Primary data strategies because of signal loss (Source)
AI and the evolution of contextual advertising
The biggest change in contextual advertising is that it has become more precise. Keyword matching is being replaced by models that can interpret meaning, sentiment, and suitability at scale.
This shift is happening alongside broader AI adoption. McKinsey’s 2024 survey reported65% of respondents said their organizations were regularly using generative AI.
⚡ GenAI is also changing the creative side of contextual execution. IAB reports86% of digital video buyers are using or planning to use GenAI to build video ad creative, and buyers expect GenAI-made creative to reach 40% of all ads by 2026
For contextual advertising, AI is showing up in four practical ways:
Better understanding of content (fewer false positives from keyword traps)
Faster reclassification (useful for fast-changing news and live content)
Creative matching (mapping messages to contexts and intents)
Optimization across fragmented supply (ranking and buying the best contexts efficiently)
In Proximic by Comscore’s 2024 State of Programmatic report, 76% of respondents said AI is expected to change how DSPs and SSPs operate, and 52% said AI use was an important factor in selecting a DSP.
There’s also a trust layer. Cisco reported that 59% of consumers said strong privacy laws make them more comfortable sharing information in AI applications.
Contextual advertising is no longer a workaround for cookie loss. When it’s done well, it’s a repeatable way to reach high-intent buyers in the moments that matter without leaning on personal data to do the heavy lifting. The brands getting the most from contextual aren’t just buying “relevant pages.” They’re building a system: clear context definitions, brand suitability rules, creative mapped to intent, and measurement that shows what’s genuinely driving outcomes.
If you want to scale contextual across display, native, video, and CTV, execution is where most teams feel the friction. You need a planning and measurement layer that can see performance across channels, and you need supply paths that give you control over where your ads run and what you’re paying for.
That’s where AI Digital can help. Elevate brings campaign planning, cross-platform insights, and optimization into one intelligence layer. Smart Supply supports high-quality inventory selection and supply path optimization, so you can make contextual buying more transparent and more efficient.
If you’re exploring contextual now—or you’re already running it and want to tighten performance, brand suitability, and reporting—get in touch. We’ll walk through your goals, map the contexts that matter for your category, and outline a practical test plan you can take live without rebuilding your entire stack.
Blind spot
Key issues
Business impact
AI Digital solution
Lack of transparency in AI models
• Platforms own AI models and train on proprietary data • Brands have little visibility into decision-making • "Walled gardens" restrict data access
• Inefficient ad spend • Limited strategic control • Eroded consumer trust • Potential budget mismanagement
Open Garden framework providing: • Complete transparency • DSP-agnostic execution • Cross-platform data & insights
Optimizing ads vs. optimizing impact
• AI excels at short-term metrics but may struggle with brand building • Consumers can detect AI-generated content • Efficiency might come at cost of authenticity
• Short-term gains at expense of brand health • Potential loss of authentic connection • Reduced effectiveness in storytelling
Smart Supply offering: • Human oversight of AI recommendations • Custom KPI alignment beyond clicks • Brand-safe inventory verification
The illusion of personalization
• Segment optimization rebranded as personalization • First-party data infrastructure challenges • Personalization vs. surveillance concerns
• Potential mismatch between promise and reality • Privacy concerns affecting consumer trust • Cost barriers for smaller businesses
Elevate platform features: • Real-time AI + human intelligence • First-party data activation • Ethical personalization strategies
AI-Driven efficiency vs. decision-making
• AI shifting from tool to decision-maker • Black box optimization like Google Performance Max • Human oversight limitations
• Strategic control loss • Difficulty questioning AI outputs • Inability to measure granular impact • Potential brand damage from mistakes
Managed Service with: • Human strategists overseeing AI • Custom KPI optimization • Complete campaign transparency
Fig. 1. Summary of AI blind spots in advertising
Dimension
Walled garden advantage
Walled garden limitation
Strategic impact
Audience access
Massive, engaged user bases
Limited visibility beyond platform
Reach without understanding
Data control
Sophisticated targeting tools
Data remains siloed within platform
Fragmented customer view
Measurement
Detailed in-platform metrics
Inconsistent cross-platform standards
Difficult performance comparison
Intelligence
Platform-specific insights
Limited data portability
Restricted strategic learning
Optimization
Powerful automated tools
Black-box algorithms
Reduced marketer control
Fig. 2. Strategic trade-offs in walled garden advertising.
Core issue
Platform priority
Walled garden limitation
Real-world example
Attribution opacity
Claiming maximum credit for conversions
Limited visibility into true conversion paths
Meta and TikTok's conflicting attribution models after iOS privacy updates
Data restrictions
Maintaining proprietary data control
Inability to combine platform data with other sources
Amazon DSP's limitations on detailed performance data exports
Cross-channel blindspots
Keeping advertisers within ecosystem
Fragmented view of customer journey
YouTube/DV360 campaigns lacking integration with non-Google platforms
Black box algorithms
Optimizing for platform revenue
Reduced control over campaign execution
Self-serve platforms using opaque ML models with little advertiser input
Performance reporting
Presenting platform in best light
Discrepancies between platform-reported and independently measured results
Consistently higher performance metrics in platform reports vs. third-party measurement
Fig. 1. The Walled garden misalignment: Platform interests vs. advertiser needs.
Key dimension
Challenge
Strategic imperative
ROAS volatility
Softer returns across digital channels
Shift from soft KPIs to measurable revenue impact
Media planning
Static plans no longer effective
Develop agile, modular approaches adaptable to changing conditions
Brand/performance
Traditional division dissolving
Create full-funnel strategies balancing long-term equity with short-term conversion
Capability
Key features
Benefits
Performance data
Elevate forecasting tool
• Vertical-specific insights • Historical data from past economic turbulence • "Cascade planning" functionality • Real-time adaptation
• Provides agility to adjust campaign strategy based on performance • Shows which media channels work best to drive efficient and effective performance • Confident budget reallocation • Reduces reaction time to market shifts
• Dataset from 10,000+ campaigns • Cuts response time from weeks to minutes
• Reaches people most likely to buy • Avoids wasted impressions and budgets on poor-performing placements • Context-aligned messaging
• 25+ billion bid requests analyzed daily • 18% improvement in working media efficiency • 26% increase in engagement during recessions
Full-funnel accountability
• Links awareness campaigns to lower funnel outcomes • Tests if ads actually drive new business • Measures brand perception changes • "Ask Elevate" AI Chat Assistant
• Upper-funnel to outcome connection • Sentiment shift tracking • Personalized messaging • Helps balance immediate sales vs. long-term brand building
• Natural language data queries • True business impact measurement
Open Garden approach
• Cross-platform and channel planning • Not locked into specific platforms • Unified cross-platform reach • Shows exactly where money is spent
• Reduces complexity across channels • Performance-based ad placement • Rapid budget reallocation • Eliminates platform-specific commitments and provides platform-based optimization and agility
• Coverage across all inventory sources • Provides full visibility into spending • Avoids the inability to pivot across platform as you’re not in a singular platform
Fig. 1. How AI Digital helps during economic uncertainty.
Trend
What it means for marketers
Supply & demand lines are blurring
Platforms from Google (P-Max) to Microsoft are merging optimization and inventory in one opaque box. Expect more bundled “best available” media where the algorithm, not the trader, decides channel and publisher mix.
Walled gardens get taller
Microsoft’s O&O set now spans Bing, Xbox, Outlook, Edge and LinkedIn, which just launched revenue-sharing video programs to lure creators and ad dollars. (Business Insider)
Retail & commerce media shape strategy
Microsoft’s Curate lets retailers and data owners package first-party segments, an echo of Amazon’s and Walmart’s approaches. Agencies must master seller-defined audiences as well as buyer-side tactics.
AI oversight becomes critical
Closed AI bidding means fewer levers for traders. Independent verification, incrementality testing and commercial guardrails rise in importance.
Fig. 1. Platform trends and their implications.
Metric
Connected TV (CTV)
Linear TV
Video Completion Rate
94.5%
70%
Purchase Rate After Ad
23%
12%
Ad Attention Rate
57% (prefer CTV ads)
54.5%
Viewer Reach (U.S.)
85% of households
228 million viewers
Retail Media Trends 2025
Access Complete consumer behaviour analyses and competitor benchmarks.
Identify and categorize audience groups based on behaviors, preferences, and characteristics
Michaels Stores: Implemented a genAI platform that increased email personalization from 20% to 95%, leading to a 41% boost in SMS click through rates and a 25% increase in engagement.
Estée Lauder: Partnered with Google Cloud to leverage genAI technologies for real-time consumer feedback monitoring and analyzing consumer sentiment across various channels.
High
Medium
Automated ad campaigns
Automate ad creation, placement, and optimization across various platforms
Showmax: Partnered with AI firms toautomate ad creation and testing, reducing production time by 70% while streamlining their quality assurance process.
Headway: Employed AI tools for ad creation and optimization, boosting performance by 40% and reaching 3.3 billion impressions while incorporating AI-generated content in 20% of their paid campaigns.
High
High
Brand sentiment tracking
Monitor and analyze public opinion about a brand across multiple channels in real time
L’Oréal: Analyzed millions of online comments, images, and videos to identify potential product innovation opportunities, effectively tracking brand sentiment and consumer trends.
Kellogg Company: Used AI to scan trending recipes featuring cereal, leveraging this data to launch targeted social campaigns that capitalize on positive brand sentiment and culinary trends.
High
Low
Campaign strategy optimization
Analyze data to predict optimal campaign approaches, channels, and timing
DoorDash: Leveraged Google’s AI-powered Demand Gen tool, which boosted its conversion rate by 15 times and improved cost per action efficiency by 50% compared with previous campaigns.
Kitsch: Employed Meta’s Advantage+ shopping campaigns with AI-powered tools to optimize campaigns, identifying and delivering top-performing ads to high-value consumers.
High
High
Content strategy
Generate content ideas, predict performance, and optimize distribution strategies
JPMorgan Chase: Collaborated with Persado to develop LLMs for marketing copy, achieving up to 450% higher clickthrough rates compared with human-written ads in pilot tests.
Hotel Chocolat: Employed genAI for concept development and production of its Velvetiser TV ad, which earned the highest-ever System1 score for adomestic appliance commercial.
High
High
Personalization strategy development
Create tailored messaging and experiences for consumers at scale
Stitch Fix: Uses genAI to help stylists interpret customer feedback and provide product recommendations, effectively personalizing shopping experiences.
Instacart: Uses genAI to offer customers personalized recipes, mealplanning ideas, and shopping lists based on individual preferences and habits.
Medium
Medium
Share article
Url copied to clipboard
No items found.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Questions? We have answers
Why is contextual advertising important in a cookieless world?
Contextual advertising stays effective when cookie-based targeting and third-party IDs are limited because contextual ads are matched to the page, app, or video environment, not to a user profile. That makes content-based advertising a practical way to keep delivering relevant ads using semantic targeting and other context signals.
How is contextual advertising different from behavioral advertising?
Contextual advertising uses the content someone is viewing to decide which contextual ad to show, while behavioral advertising relies on past actions and identity signals to target the person across sites or sessions. In other words, contextual is content-targeted campaigns and context-driven ads, whereas behavioral is user-based targeting.
Which channels are best for contextual advertising campaigns?
Contextual advertising performs best in channels with strong contextual signals, like premium web and app environments, native placements, and video/CTV where content-aligned promotions can be matched to genres, shows, or moments. Display and native are usually the easiest starting points, then video and CTV for scale.
What are the costs of running contextual advertising campaigns?
Costs depend on the inventory quality, the competitiveness of your chosen contexts, and how narrow your targeting is, but contextual ads often give you steadier pricing than third-party segments because you’re buying media based on content, not paying extra for user data. You’ll still see CPM variation, especially for premium placements and highly constrained suitability requirements.
How can I measure the effectiveness of contextual ads?
Measure contextual advertising by reporting performance by context segment (topic, sentiment, suitability tier), then compare against a non-context baseline using lift tests, holdouts, or incrementality methods where possible. For context-driven ads, you want to see not just clicks but conversion lift, CPA stability, and downstream impact like branded search or site engagement.
Is contextual advertising more privacy-friendly than other ad methods?
Generally, yes—contextual advertising is typically more privacy-friendly because it doesn’t require personal identifiers to run content-targeted campaigns. Since the targeting is based on the content environment, contextual ad delivery can reduce dependence on tracking while still serving relevant ads.
Have other questions?
If you have more questions, contact us so we can help.